manufacturing nature through art
I don’t quite understand the idea of trompe l’oeil, the french phrase for fooling the eye. Other than the obvious: to prove you can make something so good it fools others into thinking art is reality, it seems to be more science than art. To be accomplished at it is to be technically skilled, and enormously patient at your special ability. But that also describes people who make Ferraris. You’re proving your own virtuosity. Although you could be having a laugh at fooling other people. Like the roadrunner and coyote in Warner Brothers animation, where the coyote paints a tunnel on a solid face, only for the roadrunner to make the trick a reality.
This week I made my way to see this sort of thing firsthand in Sheffield. I’ve never been to Sheffield before, itself a trompe l’oeil of English pastures from the Victorian era. The show was called “Out of the Ordinary” at Sheffield’s Millennium Gallery, and focused on craft usage in contemporary times. Among the handful of artist was a Japanese person called Yoshihiro Suda. The short biography of him is, “He creates hyper-realistic flowers and weeds from wood.” I get the irony, but isn’t that like carving the perfect pebble from a rock. Or to use the Ferrari analogy, making a car out of a new refrigerator. His flower “sculpture” was protected by walls and a security rope where you couldn’t get any closer than about 12 feet. I was beginning to doubt the quality. How good can it be if I’m standing across the room to look at it?
Yoshihiro Suda
Trompe l’oeil comes up in the Autumn issue of Tate Etc. magazine as well, where a section of the magazine is devoted to the history of fooling the eye, back to the early 15th century. Back then the point was to make it as realistic as possible because until then, I guess, nobody did it. The article continues to 20th century artists like Rene Magritte, Duane Hanson, Andy Warhol. I remember seeing my first Duane Hanson “statue” of an overweight tourist. It was more creepy than sublime, but nonetheless it made me flinch, which is what good quality art is supposed to do. Let’s add that to the list of results from trompe l’oeil: in addition to be impressive by way of its craft quality, it can creep you out too.
In the same article is a reference to a work at the Venice Biennale: a mural by Thomas Demand called “Clearing”. It’s a very large photograph of the very thing it’s supposed to hide: the forest behind it. This one goes one loop further though; it’s a photograph, of a sculptural stage, of a photograph of trees. A long way to go, right? The sculpture is made from 280,000 separate pieces of coloured paper, constructed by 30 people working for three months. That IS a long way to go. Apparently not only do you need the technical mastery to do these things, you have to have a lot of friends, or a lot of money.
Thomas Demand: Clearing
Discoveries this week are this: trompe l’oeil requires loads of patience, technical ability, friends, money and a sense of humour. All this work to prove one thing: you can do something better than anyone else. Just like making a Ferrari.
February 2nd, 2010 at 06:10
Added to my favourites list and added to my blogroll.
February 10th, 2010 at 03:38
You made some Good points there. I did a search on the topic and found most people will agree.
March 13th, 2010 at 12:06
Hello, just needed you to know I have added your site to my Google bookmarks because of your great blog layout. But seriously, I think your site has one of the freshest theme I’ve came across. It really helps make reading your blog a lot better.
March 15th, 2010 at 08:50
Great info! I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don
March 19th, 2010 at 04:55
[...] is currently on display through February 7 in an exhibition titled Yoshihiro Suda: In Focus. …manufacturing nature through art | contemporary monkeyAmong the handful of artist was a Japanese person called Yoshihiro Suda. … Name (required) Mail [...]
March 27th, 2010 at 20:07
It does seem that everybody is into this kind of stuff lately. Don’t really understand it though, but thanks for trying to explain it. Appreciate you shedding light into this matter. Keep it up
March 28th, 2010 at 11:22
Completely understand what your stance in this matter. Although I would disagree on some of the finer details, I think you did an awesome job explaining it. Sure beats having to research it on my own. Thanks
May 8th, 2010 at 09:47
An old error is always more popular than a new truth.
May 8th, 2010 at 11:38
Please, keep up the greet work and continue to post topics like this. I am old fan of your page!
May 18th, 2010 at 07:17
Thank you very much this is a very nice information!. . . . . .
May 20th, 2010 at 17:15
Hey this is a great story. I’m going to email this to my buddies. I stumbled on this while googling for some music lyrics, I’ll be sure to visit regularly. thanks for sharing.
May 23rd, 2010 at 16:47
Thank you for the sensible critique. Me and my neighbor were just preparing to do some research about this. We got a grab a book from our local library but I think I learned more from this post. I am very glad to see such great information being shared freely out there.
May 24th, 2010 at 07:43
Have you ever considered adding more videos to your blog posts to keep the readers more entertained? I mean I just read through the entire article of yours and it was quite good but since I’m more of a visual learner,I found that to be more helpful well let me know how it turns out! I love what you guys are always up too. Such clever work and reporting! Keep up the great works guys I’ve added you guys to my blogroll. This is a great article thanks for sharing this informative information.. I will visit your blog regularly for some latest post.